Under the guise of “ending hate”, the Government of Canada is facilitating a radical demographic change of our founding population.
This hypocrisy of biblical proportions aims at reducing Canadians to a dwindled minority in their own country in order to transition us into “the world’s first post-national country” as communicated by the Liberal government shortly after their election to the Prime Minister’s office in 2015.
In order to do so, this administration is depriving our nation of any meaningful democratic channel.
At seemingly every opportunity, those who advocate the ideology of nationalism are excluded from public property without due process. This includes libraries we’ve not been to, convention centers we’ve already booked, and university campuses we’re alumni of.
The perpetrators claim that our propaganda entitled “Beware The Parasitic Tribe” is a criminal liability under section 319 of the Criminal Code. They’ve been making such accusations since June of 2019 and we’ve yet to receive a copy of the evidence used against us despite numerous requests for full and frank disclosure.
The reason that these Globalists are attempting to suppress our voices and injure our public image is because they know the only ideology capable of resisting their hostile takeover of our sovereignty is that of nationalism – a group of people united by ancestry and origin, speaking the same language and working for a common objective.
If they are to achieve their political agenda of a one-world government oligarchy, they cannot have sovereign nations operating autonomously and outside their locus of control.
In 2021, shortly after I was denied reasonable bail by the Provincial Court of Saskatchewan, Elections Canada (supposedly partisan and independent) changed the information contained in their registry as it related to the Canadian Nationalist Party, replacing myself as the leader with Gus Stefanis (someone who was neither a candidate nor a party member at the time):
In accordance with section 405(3) of the Canada Elections Act, such a change in the information of a registered party must be made by resolution of the party. However, at no point did our party resolve to appoint a new leader …
New Leader
The report of a change of leader for a party shall include a copy of the resolution of the party to appoint the new leader, certified by the new leader and another officer of the party.
– Section 405(3), Canada Elections Act
The Canadian Nationalist Party is structured as a corporate sole, meaning that with only a single director, the decisions which affect the corporation cannot be made except by the will of the director or some authority above them.
With the actual leader (myself) being arbitrarily imprisoned by the Province Of Saskatchewan, and new leader (Gus Stefanis) unable to maintain 250 declared members, Elections Canada de-registered the party.
On March 31st, 2022, Elections Canada de-registered the federal Nationalist Party as its leader was being imprisoned in contravention of their right to have the validity of their detention determined by habeas corpus.
In their June 29th, 2021 decision, Justice Robertson of the Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan, refused my application to perform (by way of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum) a review of jurisdictional error in applying a reverse onus. Justice Robertson would later go on to preside over proceedings in the Court of King’s Bench, where I was sentenced ultra vires to 365 days incarceration for the aforementioned propaganda.
On December 2nd, 2021, the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan (CACR3476) refused to perform such a review of jurisdictional error made in denying me bail earlier that year on April 16th.
The Province Of Saskatchewan committed an error in law by applying a reverse onus on the accused to show cause why they should be granted release during a bail review. During this bail review, the court used accusations of so-called “hate speech” in relation to the party leader publishing propaganda entitled Beware The Parasitic Tribe in June of 2019 as secondary grounds to deny reasonable bail.
This propaganda uploaded to our website in June of 2019 is not a criminal liability because the Province Of Saskatchewan lacks inpersonam jurisdiction to prosecute such matters under section 319 of the Criminal Code.
What the Province Of Saskatchewan has actually done is aid in illegally depriving our nation of a democratic channel.
The right to have the validity of a person’s imprisonment determined by writ of habeas corpus is a fundamental principle of justice inherent in the constitution of all countries within the British Commonwealth.
It is also encoded in section 2 of our Canadian Bill of Rights:
The Parliament of Canada, affirming that our nation is founded upon the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person, and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions which remain free only with respect to morality, spirituality, and the rule of law.
Every law of Canada shall, unless it is expressly declared by an Act of the Parliament of Canada that is shall operate notwithstanding the Canadian Bill of Rights, be so construed and applied as not to abrogate, abridge or infringe or to authorize the abrogation, abridgement or infringement of any of the rights and freedoms herein recognized and declared, and in particular, no law of Canada shall be construed or applied so as to deprive a person who has been detained with remedy by way of habeas corpus for the determination of the validity of his imprisonment and for his release if the detention is not lawful;
– Section 2(c)(iii), Canadian Bill of Rights
This is a federal issue which demands a court proceeding be conducted pursuant section 784(3) of the Criminal Code:
Refusal of application, and appeal
Where an application for a writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum is refused by a judge of a court having jurisdiction therein, no application may again be made on the same grounds, whether to the same or to another court or judge, unless fresh evidence is adduced, but an appeal from that refusal shall lie to the court of appeal, and where on the appeal the application is refused a further appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court of Canada, with leave of that Court.
– Section 784(3), Criminal Code
Shortly after the change in Elections Canada’s registry of party information was made, Stefanis was allowed to stand for nomination as a candidate in the 44th Federal Election with Elections Canada.
The name ‘Canadian Nationalist Party’ is proprietary information not to be used without the necessary permissions.
Trafficking in Identity Information
Everyone commits an offence who obtains or possesses another person’s identity information with intent to use it to commit an indictable offence that includes fraud, deceit, or falsehood as an element of the offence.
– Section 402.2(2), Criminal Code
I bring this matter to the public’s attention not for my sake as an individual, but for the sake of our collective, our nationality. Something is clearly wrong when our nation can be so nonchalantly the victim of elections fraud.
Fraud Affecting Public Market
Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, with intent to defraud, affects the public market price of stocks, shares, merchandise or anything that is offered for sale to the public is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.
– Section 380(2), Criminal Code
Part of the reason I ran in this here 45th Federal Election was to bring public accountability to this claim of elections fraud. However, it seems Elections Canada is intent on covering up their violation of our party using more lies.
Below you will see the list of candidates standing for election in the district of Souris-Moose Mountain. You will also notice my campaign website (www.travispatron.ca) conspicuously missing from their listing despite being included in my nomination papers.
In response to Elections Canada not listing my campaign website, I filed a complaint with their office on Friday, April 11th. A week later my website is still not listed but I did receive this response from Elections Canada, refusing to list this website because, in their opinion, it is “hateful”:
This sort of baseless accusation is becoming increasingly common in Canadian society and used to unreasonably deprive our people of all sorts of public services.
At this point, my message to Canadians would be that if we are waiting for political change to come through the ballot box, we will be waiting until the cows come home.
One of the strengths of nationalism lies in its versatility. What I mean by this is that if the status quo is providing us no meaningful democratic channel, than our activism must take on an anti-democratic form.
We need not wait for the next opportunity to compete in one of Elections Canada’s contests because liberation is simply not on the ballot.