The Royal Canadian Legion is a public house subject to the right of candidates running in the ongoing 45th Federal Election to make reasonable use of the premises in order to promote Canadian nationalism:
Right of Candidates to Campaign in Public Places
No person who is in control of a building, any part of which is open without charge to members of the public, whether on a continuous, periodic or occasional basis – including any commercial, business, cultural, historic, educational, religious, governmental, entertainment or recreational place – may prevent a candidate from campaigning in that part when it is open without charge to members of the public.
– Section 81.1(1), Canada Elections Act
The purpose of the Royal Canadian Legion is to promote the ideology of Canadian nationalism.
RCL Branch #293 in Redvers is no exception to this rule. When the writ is in force, election candidates are entitled to make reasonable use of the space.
Provincial Public Works and Property to be Property of Canada “Custom Houses, Post Offices, and all other public buildings, except such as the Government of Canada sees appropriate for the use of the provincial legislatures and governments.”
– Third Schedule(8), British North America Act (1867)
The Canada Elections Act sets out the rights of candidates and their representatives to canvass and campaign in public places.
After election day (April 28th), the rights pursuant the Canada Elections Act empowering candidates to the use of public places for campaigning expires. This is not to say that a political entity loses the right to use public property for campaign purposes, only that the provisions contained in the Canada Elections Act cease to apply after April 28th.
A person who claims to be in control of a public building must identify themselves if they are invoking an exception to deny candidates and their representatives the right to campaign there.
A wide variety of locations that are open free of charge to the public, even if privately owned, qualify as public places.
When deciding whether to invoke an exception to the right of access for canvassing or campaigning, the person in control of the premises should interpret the candidate’s right broadly in light of the democratic principles at stake and must treat all candidates equitably.
The person in control of a premises may be committing an offense if their decision to deny access is not based on an applicable exception.
Every person in control of premises who refuses to give access to a building open to the public when an exception does not apply is guilty of an offense.
Every person who contravenes subsection 81.1(1) (refusal to give access to place open to the public) is guilty of an offense.
– Section 486(2), Canada Elections Act
As it now stands, there exists no reason to exclude myself or members of the Canadian Nationalist Party from making use of Redvers Legion Branch #293 for electoral purposes. Neither does there exist reason to exclude us from any branch of the Royal Canadian Legion.
The reason many of these Legion branches are on the brink of insolvency is because they are managed by people who do not represent the values held dear by Canadians.
For the sake of our national heritage, it may be time for a changing of the guard at the Royal Canadian Legion …
Today is my 34th birthday and I wish for nothing more than a fair trial from Canada.
I’m talking about one where the evidence used to lay charges is made available to the accused person so that they can make full answer and defense.
This is a fundamental principle of justice.
“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”
– Section 7, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
I, the Leader of the Canadian Nationalist Party, have spent 41 of the last 46 months of my life imprisoned by the Province Of Saskatchewan. As a result of this malicious prosecution, Canada has been illegally deprived of its ‘Nationalist’ electoral option.
“The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedomsguarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.”
– Section 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
If our right to a democratic society is “guaranteed” by section 1 of the Charter, than any information that has been used by Canada to deprive our nation of that guarantee must be made available.
Our party listing on the Elections Canada website prior to being de-registered on March 31st, 2022 while the leader was arbitrarily imprisoned by the Province Of Saskatchewan.
As it now stands, I await a file number from the Federal Court of Canada on an application for judicial review where access to personal information has been refused (Privacy Commissioner of Canada, #PA-067942).
This application was filed on March 21st and ought to be heard in a summary way because the Governor General should not to be issuing a writ of further election (as was done on March 23rd) until a decision is made on such an application:
Hearing in a Summary Way “An application made under section 41, 42 or 43 shall be heard and determined in a summary way in accordance with any special rules made in respect of such applications pursuant to section 46 of the Federal Courts Act.”
– Section 44, Privacy Act
Our application is for a copy of the criminal complaint made under occurrence #2019-919038 and used by Justice Hinds to effect the arbitrary imprisonment of my person in the Provincial Court of Saskatchewan on April 16th, 2021.
Service on Attorney General of Canada, Arif Virani (March 21st, 2025)
The Department Of Justice for Canada claims that there exists no such record of the criminal complaint used to lay charges under section 319 of the Criminal Code in response to my propaganda entitled Beware The Parasitic Tribe.
Rules “Subject to the approval of the Governor in Council and subject also to subsection (4), the rules committee may make general rules and orders for regulating the practice and procedure in the Federal Court of Appeal and in the Federal Court, including, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, rules providing for discovery and production, and supplying of copies, of documents by the Crown in a proceeding to which the Crown is a party”
– Section 46(1)(a)(ii), Federal Courts Act
This content was published under my domain in June of 2019. Almost 6 years later, and despite my representations to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada, I have yet to receive the criminal complaint used in the matter …
An internet meme entitled “Beware The Parasitic Tribe” that was published in June of 2019 and used as evidence during criminal proceedings against me under section 319 of the Criminal Code.
Wilful Promotion of Hatred
(2)(a) “Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years;”
– Section 319, Criminal Code
Failure to disclose the information to the accused represents a conflict of interest which is potentially injurious to national security:
Protection of Right to a Fair Trial (1) “The person presiding at a criminal proceeding may make any order that he considers appropriate in the circumstances to protect the right of the accused to a fair trial, as long as that order complies with the terms of any order made under any of subsections 38.06(1) to (3) in relation to that proceeding, any judgment made on appeal from, or review of, the order, or any certificate issued under section 38.13.”
(2)(c) “The orders that may be made under subsection (1) include an order finding against any party on any issue relating to information the disclosure of which is prohibited.”
– Section 38.14, Canada Evidence Act
Disclosure of the information used to lay charges under this section is necessary in order to provide a fair trial because there is more at stake here than simply proceedings between myself as an individual and the Province Of Saskatchewan:
Disclosure Order (5) “If the court having jurisdiction to hear the application concludes that the disclosure of the information to which the objection was made under subsection (1) would encroach upon a specified public interest, but that the public interest in disclosure outweighs in importance the specified public interest, the court may, by order, after considering both the public interest in disclosure and the form of and conditions to disclosure that are most likely to limit any encroachment upon the specified public interest resulting from disclosure, authorize the disclosure, subject to any conditions that the court considers appropriate, of all of the information, a part or summary of the information, or a written admission of facts relating to the information.”
– Section 37, Canada Evidence Act
The manner in which the Province Of Saskatchewan has been proceeding against the Canadian Nationalist Party is a crime against humanity:
Definitions (3) “Crime against humanity means persecution that is committed against any civilian population and that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a crime against humanity according to customary international law by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission.”
(4) “For greater certainty, crimes described in Articles 6 and 7 and paragraph 2 of Article 8 of the Rome Statute are, as of July 17, 1998, crimes according to customary international law. This does not limit or prejudice in any way the application of existing or developing rules of international law.”
– Section 4, Crimes Against Humanity & War Crimes Act
War Crimes (a)(vi) For the purpose of this Statute, war crimes means grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of August 12th, 1949, namely, willfully depriving a protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial;
– Rome Statute, paragraph 2
In accordance with our section 7 Charter right, the nationhood of Canada is a protected person.
As a class action, we demand that the Crown uphold our right to personal security and provide us a fair trial by disclosing the information used by Carlyle RCMP to lay charges against us under section 319 of the Criminal Code.
This arrest was conducted on February 14th, 2021. Constable Brandon Glaser was the arresting officer.
Payout from the Crimes Against Humanity Fund is also in order:
Fund established
“It is hereby established a fund, to be known as the Crimes Against Humanity Fund, into which shall be paid
(a) all money obtained through enforcement in Canada of orders of the International Criminal Court for reparation or forfeiture or orders of that Court imposing a fine; (b) all money obtained in accordance with section 31; and (c) any money otherwise received as a donation to the Crimes Against Humanity Fund”
– section 30, Crimes Against Humanity & War Crimes Act (CAH&WCA)
Credits to the Fund
“The Minister of Public Works and Government Services shall pay into the Crimes Against Humanity Fund:
(a) the net amount received from the disposition of any property referred to in subsections 4(1) to (3) of the Seized Property Management Act that is: (i) proceeds of crime within the meaning of subsection 462.3(1) of the Criminal Code, obtained or derived directly or indirectly as a result of the commission of an offense under this Act, and (ii) forfeited to Her Majesty and disposed of by that Minister; and (b) any amount paid or recovered as a fine imposed under subsection 462.37(3) of the Criminal Code in substitution for the property referred to in paragraph (a)”
– section 31, Crimes Against Humanity & War Crimes Act (CAH&WCA)
And the crime that has been committed is one of false pretense:
False pretense (1) “A false pretense is a representation of a matter of fact either present or past, made by words or otherwise, that is known by the person who makes it to be false and that is made with a fraudulent intent to induce the person to whom it is made to act on it.”
– section 361, Criminal Code
When we speak of the “Parasitic Tribe”, it is not Judah we speak of, but the hypocrite who impersonates:
“Alas, that Synagogue of Satan, who lie by claiming they are Jews, and are not, I will make them come before thy feet and know that you are the one whom I love.”
